<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>People on Alexander Arvidsson</title>
    <link>/tags/people/</link>
    <description>Recent content in People on Alexander Arvidsson</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/people/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Don&#39;t &#39;Fix&#39; Your People. Fix Your Process.</title>
      <link>/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms-2/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms-2/</guid>
      <description>Your AI policy was written for someone who doesn&amp;rsquo;t work on your team.Your AI policy was written for someone who doesn&amp;rsquo;t work on your team. Probably for someone who doesn&amp;rsquo;t exist. Part 2 of this series moves from research to practice. The key variable isn&amp;rsquo;t cognitive profile — it&amp;rsquo;s domain expertise asymmetry. Where that gap is largest, the agreement machine runs without a check. This post covers where the real risk concentrates, why structured review consistently outperforms &amp;lsquo;does anyone see any problems?&amp;rsquo;, and what a policy that actually changes behaviour looks like. Design the workflow. Not the person.</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms-2/cover.jpg" />
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Agreement Machine</title>
      <link>/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms/</guid>
      <description>Your brain evolved to detect lions. Now it may fire every time you open ChatGPT. This post unpacks three reasons LLMs are not neutral tools — what they&amp;rsquo;re trained on, how RLHF creates systematic pressure toward validation, and what your neurobiology does with the result. Then it gets specific: the same sycophantic system creates meaningfully different failure modes depending on who is using it. Nobody designed this. Nobody fully planned for it. And most deployment practices still aren&amp;rsquo;t accounting for it. The research is early. The mechanisms are not.</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="/posts/neurodiversity-and-llms/cover.jpg" />
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Focus on what is relevant</title>
      <link>/posts/focus-on-what-matters/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/focus-on-what-matters/</guid>
      <description>Southwest Airlines&amp;rsquo; December scheduling collapse exposed the dangers of deprioritizing both people and technical debt, as 90s-era systems designed for 300 daily operations failed under 20,000+ operations following a leadership shift from operational focus to profit-driven management.</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="/posts/focus-on-what-matters/cover.jpg" />
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
